Monday, December 21, 2015

CMT - Hercules ('97)



For many people, Disney's “Hercules” is the definitive version of the character. They may be wholly unaware, that the film's narrative strays far from established mythology. It is commonplace, for changes to be made in an adaptation to theaters. By now it should be expected, but rarely is it explained.

Movies are subject to strict time constraints, and a loose interpretation of the source material, alleviates some of the burden. However, a great number of liberties are taken by productions and they all can't be so easily categorized. Ultimately, the story is subject to the whims of the storyteller, and that person has their own motivations. The reasons may not be immediately clear, but it's helpful to remember that a tale is for its audience.


Classic Movie Trailers – Hercules (1997)


Hercules was born to Zeus and Alcmene, a mortal woman of great beauty. She was deceived by the god, who laid with her in the guise of her husband. The child was, by nature, a half-breed. He was also a living reminder of Zeus's infidelity.

Hera sent the snakes, to the infant's crib. She hated Hercules, from the moment he was conceived. It was Hera, the wife of Zeus who schemed and plotted against him. Her rage afflicted him with madness, and he killed Megara, along with their children.

So there's nothing family-friendly about those myths. Changes were going to be made, but the decisions are interesting. One of the most telling choices, is the depiction of Hades. The god of the Greek underworld is not Satan's analogue, but here they are synonymous.

In both manner and deed, the Hades of this film is unmistakably evil. Gone is his firm, fair and just hand, in favor of a fiery persona. The Devil is instantly recognizable, and his presence is easy to understand. For a modern, moviegoing audience, that isn't well versed in history, a predominant figure is a considerable comfort.

This entire take on Hercules, was possibly meant to make him more relatable. Instead of a man, that is born simply better than the masses, we're given a god that is humbled to walk as a man. He earns his name as a hero, and he strives to achieve greatness. In the end however, he abandons that goal to settle down and love.

I haven't met a person that would turn down immortality for marriage and death. It is pretty silly, when you sit and think about it, but our heroes are supposed to be those that we aspire to. That sort of resolution also casts mortality, in a more favorable light. If Hercules can choose the fate so easily, it must not be that bad.

It's a feel good movie, with a predictable ending. There are no horrible, tragic events to deal with, and the hero doesn't spend time laboring for his sins. We're allowed to eat our popcorn and cheer him on. When all is said and done, you don't have to think too much.

Personally, I was inclined to consider the work for a long while. I've come to the conclusion, that this is a different Hercules. He's akin to Frankenstein, in the Universal classic; there is a separate base for the character, but he stands on his own. Who am I to determine the definitive version? It's hard to make a qualitative statement, in the court of public opinion.

There are at least three epics, called “Lord Of The Rings”. One is in print and two are on screen. As I understand it, they are very different things, but people are going to choose the version they please. What came before doesn't matter ultimately; some will swear by the books and others will disregard them.

Mythology can be thought of, as an extension of oral tradition. How many times has the story of Hercules changed through the ages? The original tale is lost in time and it has little importance. Back then it was as it is today, with the story at the whim of the storyteller.







--------------------------
@ChannelSeals

See “Hercules” on Netflix!

Christmas Eve: A bonus look at “A Nightmare Before Christmas”

Next Monday: James and The Giant Peach

No comments:

Post a Comment